David Hall
 
 
 
 

Sydney FC coach Ian Crook obviously has too much time on his hands. Not in the YouTube surfing and eating an entire packet of Iced VoVos kind of way, but the Hyundai A-League season hasn’t even started yet and he’s already saying he wants more, more, more.

Crook’s argument is that, for the sake of increased competition and player development, A-League clubs should play each other four times a year, rather than the three fixtures they currently have.

This “fourth round” would increase the season from 27 matches to 36, with finals tagged on to the end of that.

It’s hard to know how to feel about this. My first reaction: brilliant! More football! Too much is never enough!

It’s easy to pity dedicated football fans in Australia, as their true love gets swamped by lesser but more popular codes. There isn’t enough football in this country.

A six-month off-season is a terrible famine, with naught to sustain us but the late-night left-overs from the other side of the globe. If football is Macca’s, let’s super-size it and become a nation of footy fatties. I’m with the Crookie Monster! Om nom nom nom!

Then the brain overtakes the gluttony, and argues there is already too much football in the world.

Like most football fans, I also follow the major European competitions, and with the various international tournaments wedged in between, football never stops and I never sleep.

Sometimes I think I suffer from football fatigue. Try to converse with me in the December-January high season, and I’m a haunted man, black-eyed, slack-jawed, drooling and moaning “4-4-2, 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1”. I’m a football zombie lumbering across continents and existing in between time zones with a remote control in one hand and a constantly updating Twitter feed in the other, feasting on the brains of anyone willing to talk about transfer windows and managerial meltdowns.

Being a football journo doesn’t help that state of ceaseless unrest. It sounds like a dream job (and I’m not denying almost everyone has it worse than me) but when football’s your Monday-Sunday job, it can squeeze just a little bit of the joy out of it.

If they do decide to stretch the competition out further, I think I may end up divorced, with my laptop hardwired straight into my brain. A single soccer cyborg, like Robocop, with 36 weeks to comply.

But this isn’t all about me. You have to ask, is this season extension even feasible in Australia? Do clubs have the resources and the playing squads to last the distance?

European clubs have mammoth playing rosters exactly because they have to cope with the demands of a 38-week season, give or take. Nicky Carle can hardly last a whole season as it is. His knees might hand in a transfer request if it goes on any longer.

And could the game carry this sort of growth? We would either have to extend into the AFL and NRL seasons, which is hardly an ideal situation to start or finish our competition, or have more midweek games, which haven’t proven a sure-fire hit in the past.

And, with all due respect and love, can the A-League sustain interest in teams playing each other four times a year? Would I really like to watch Perth v Wellington four times in one season?

Perhaps the better solution is the long-mooted FFA Cup, which would deliver extra games with all the added incentive and drama of a knockout competition, and offer good development for clubs and players within and beyond the A-League, but without a 36-week season stretching out in front of you like crossing the Nullarbor on a flat-tyred bike without a saddle.

 
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect those of Football Federation Australia.
Comments (28)
 
More teams would be better than more rounds but i`m all in favour of extending the season. Regions like Wollongong,Canberra,Tasmania,Darwin etc should be explored as to their viability. FFA Cup would also be a great addition to the season. Maybe lining up the winners from the States with the Aleague teams.It could be held to coincide with the ALeague pre-season.
Duggo  |  
25 Sep 2012 10:42 PM
 
 
Ageed, seperate cup comp, like fa cup. With top six amature teams in the country, drawn to play away in the first round.that will blend the two levels together more , and also give those teams at the bottom of the ladder something to play for
Peter oldham  |  
13 Aug 2012 06:43 PM
 
 
A cup competition gives the opportunity to rid the A-League of the ridiculous play-off system, which isn't part of football culture. Why not award the League championship on the basis of a pure round-robin league format? Follow this up with an knock-out Cup competition (home and away), with the Cup knock-out seeded in accordance with the final League standings. This means there will always be something to play for in terms of where teams end up on the table. Then we can have a pure League (which determines the best team) and a pure Cup (with the excitement that brings) - and more football!!
Jambonz  |  
8 Aug 2012 10:36 AM
 
 
no brainer....more footie
paullt  |  
7 Aug 2012 06:57 AM
 
 
A 4 round A-League would be a great idea for us the football fans who pay to watch games. Id rather watch 4 and even 5 rounds of any A-League match, rather than not having to watch football at all during the winter months. Its a lonely world out there in the cold of winter when the only other option for die hard football fans who don't follow eggball sports is state league football. Football fans go to games to support their club and state league clubs play games in front of empty stands because nobody wants to support them, for well known and well publicised reasons. Is that simple. If an FFA Cup style competition is introduced that includes the very state league clubs nobody wants to support, the A-League will eventually have the same fate the previous national club competitions had, which is death. Nobody should ever test whether the dislike of the bulk of A-League supporters for mono-ethnic clubs is stronger than their love for their A-League club or not. Never. Don't throw mono-ethnic clubs and A-League clubs in the same melting pot with an FFA Cup. The addition of an extra round is a much safer way to extend the A-League season if need be.
aleagueaddict  |  
30 Jul 2012 09:52 AM
 
 
Would love to have a Cup competition introduced in the up coming seasons, with state league teams starting out and a-league clubs joining in later. Then having a Cup Winner vs Grand Final Winner match like the community shield. Alternatively this match could be between the League winners and the Champions this would be a great season opener.
Ritz  |  
27 Jul 2012 07:44 PM
 
 
Is there anyway we can play football (soccer) away from the major stadiums and have purpose build 15,ooo seater stadiums built by FFA and leased to the clubs. A-League clubs need to have other sources of revenue such as Leagues clubs, community training centres, and hotels. Bring young local players through a youth academy and the sale of 1/2 players a season to European clubs would allow our A-League clubs to become financially viable and look after the fans. There is too much financial strain on fans at the moment because clubs have no other way of getting revenue other than sponsorship, gate receipts and FFA handouts.
Fisher  |  
27 Jul 2012 03:14 PM
 
 
Ian Crook is right seeking a longer season -say 36 matches from September until end April. The players & supporters have been pressing for more intensity through mid-week games in November/December and February/March. Introduction of an FFA Cup competition with State based clubs starting in August and A-League clubs joining at rounds 4 or 5 is essential for the games development. This would be a powerful lift for football in Australia & Asia. There needs to be a program of grooming & building Clubs in cities like Canberra, Wollongong, Gold Coast & Townsville to step-up to the A-League. A 14 team A-League should be the objective in the next 2 years.
John  |  
27 Jul 2012 10:38 AM
 
 
FFA, this is what we need. A season of Australian football that runs in parallel with Europe from around August to May with June/July as the off season. To achieve this based on a 10 team A-league model we would have the A-league run from late October to May and have an FFA Cup in which the A-league teams enter in the later rounds, from around August to October. The FFA Cup in effect becomes a pre-season for HAL. The FFA Cup could run from around May till October. I don't want to see HAL teams play each other 4 times. OK, let's go!
Stevo  |  
25 Jul 2012 08:15 PM
 
 
yes, yes, yes, - give me more!
Lubanski  |  
24 Jul 2012 07:41 PM
 
 
Having recently moved to Perth from the UK I have of course adopted Perth Glory as my team. I look forward to becoming a Member for the 2012/13 season, but having been used to getting 23 home games for my money at Scunthorpe United, my football intake will be dramatically reduced (especially as regular away trips are now out of reach!) I believe a play four timesseason would be viable, with more midweek games thrown in. For example Glory could play at one of the Sydney sides at the weekend, with a midweek trip to say Newcastle or Central Coast immediately after to keep travelling costs down. I don't really believe the A League would go stale as in Scotland, I think there is far more competition for the top spots here than in Scotland (even more so with Rangers' demotion!). I would like to see more clubs allocated into the A League, so you get to a situation where you only need to play everyone twice. Scrap the finals, why should you be given a chance to be crowned champions for finishing fifth? Ideal scenario; more clubs in the A League, playing each other twice during season. And an ongoing FFA Cup throughout the season. Finish season off with A League 1st place (champions) against the FFA Cup winners.
Scunny31  |  
23 Jul 2012 06:11 PM
 
 
Yes! More footy please! More teams, more Aussie players developing, more coaches with more ideas. More free-to-air coverage. Here's the stickler: can we make it viable?
Les  |  
20 Jul 2012 04:06 PM
 
 
i didn't bother reading the article but since we have no competitions and midweek games make the season longer and players won;t fatigue but money will be lost because of cost of stadiums in most states which is a problem. But making the season longer will have benefits.
Louis  |  
19 Jul 2012 11:41 PM
 
 
As always these things are complex. I can sympathise with the FFA and being cautious in putting much strain on the purse-strings of clubs (i.e. Fury) or fans. However, it' a global game and as we always see in our off season is that our local players are invariably not considered for international duty because of fitness issues. A longer season, which runs more in parallel with other leagues would be beneficial for player development and lift the profile of the HAL
Ken  |  
19 Jul 2012 12:55 PM
 
 
I think Crook's argument is on the money. As he freely admits there is no perfect answer but this article says that the problem is too much football on the other side of the world. Australia has an issue where the players are not being developed and therefore the standard of the league suffers. Better players are snapped up by more prosperous leagues leaving the A-League back to square one. Finance shouldn't be an issue, although admittedly a burden on existing fans, there is longer-term benefits to TV and sponsorship, in addition to ticket sales. Players get more game time and the attractiveness and level of competitiveness increase. It will be a long journey but perhaps a necessary one. I do believe that more thought is needed in to the format - teams playing each other 4 times a year is similar to the Scottish Premier League which has become stale. UK football fan
Scally  |  
19 Jul 2012 10:31 AM
 
 
Shared stadium use says we cannot extend our season in the medium term above 27 rounds in 26 weeks. Look at the state of the pitches when other codes start. These poor surfaces greatly effect our game
the duke  |  
19 Jul 2012 08:44 AM
 
 
My biggest concern for an extended season is cost - to the fans that is. How many times do you read/hear fans saying that it is too expensive, can't afford it etc. If the average cost of a ticket was $25 (yes I know you can buy cheaper) the additional matches would add $100 to a fans outlay for the season. This would most likely result in small er crowds at some games as fan looked only to attend games against those thay regard as the 'better' sides.
brisfan  |  
18 Jul 2012 07:17 PM
 
 
A longer season would be great if ffa can guarantee stability. A F |Aup type competition would be great involving lower teams as well as a league
Robert  |  
18 Jul 2012 02:34 PM
 
 
It will be good if the season is longer but unfortunately it will clash with the blood games called afl and rugby, but in the other hand football should start being brave and move for ward and don't worry about other codes.
Charlie  |  
18 Jul 2012 12:42 PM
 
 
@Jubal1 - Firstly, I disgaree that Crook is "absolutely, definitely" correct - the A-League needs stability (as you say, there are shortcoming), not further stretching of resources, no matter how noble the intentions. Secondly, the four-man bench is part of world football. If you think you know better than the rest of the world, I'm afraid you're mistaken. And thirdly, this is an independently written article; FFA had nothing to do with it at any stage and none of it reflects any opinion or direction from FFA. Give up the conspiracy theories.
David  |  
18 Jul 2012 08:39 AM
 
 
Well if the FFA had stuck by the football fans in north Queensland we would have at least one more team for everyone to play and additional games for all over the season, and Ian Crook's desire to play extra games would be satisfied. However, I like the suggestion of playing games in regional areas. Maybe the proposed fourth round could include games in regional centres, such as Townsville, Darwin, LaTrobe Valley, Canberra and Wollongong.
Jeff  |  
17 Jul 2012 08:47 PM
 
 
Ha ha ha great article! Insightful aaaand hilarious! Love those guys at SBS but we need some humour in football too! You should audition for Sports Fever.
Luke  |  
17 Jul 2012 08:31 PM
 
 
Longer season would be great. A cup format before the regular season would be best. If it comes down to the wear of the pitch the cup could be hosted at other venues around the countrie. It would be a great way to spread the a-league and see how the people see it. For example have games in Canberra, Townsville, manly, there a many choices. Short, competitive and benificial to the league is the way to go.
Lachlan  |  
17 Jul 2012 08:15 PM
 
 
It must be nice to have pet journos spout the FFA line on command, masquerading as opinion pieces. Crook is absolutely right, what he says is definitely true, instead of chucking obstacles in the way, try addressing the shortcomings of the league as it stands to accommodate a highly desirable outcome. But then I've given up hoping for foresight from a group that hasn't worked out that the 4 man bench is a huge hindrance to both team and young player performance.
jubal1  |  
17 Jul 2012 07:37 PM
 
 
The solution is three-fold: A pre-midseason FFA Cup competition involving state league teams and in the future additional lower league teams. A post-league season knockout cup involving just the A-league teams. This would replace the final series and put the league in it's rightful place as the most important determinant as to the best team in the country, while still allow other teams to compete in a post-season 'finals series'. Finally, the game must expand. The failures in North Queensland and the Gold Coast, while the success of the Melbourne Derby and the massive potential of Wanderers has shown that teams should not be placed in random regional locations. New teams should feed into new rivalries. The NRL and AFL have shown that a long-term failure to introduce multiple teams from a single city into the league system will cause expansions in the future to be much harder to develop (NRL with Brisbane becoming a dominant power, and AFL with its failures on the Gold Coast and the 2nd team). The league should be able to grow enough to sustain 18 or 20 teams and depending on the sustainability of the league perhaps 22. We are at 10 now. This gives 8 to 12 expansion slots. Here is what I believe a list of expansion teams should be in no particular order: 1. Penrith/Blacktown. Move Wanderers closer to the heartland in South West Sydney (Fairfield/Liverpool). 2. Wollongong. 3. Canberra 4. Tasmania 5. 2nd Brisbane Team. 6. 2nd NZ team. 7. 2nd Adelaide team. 8. 2nd Perth team. Football is about derbies. The league must expand in ways that give these derbies maximum exposure. If these 18 teams can be viable then the league can think about moving back into regional areas like Gold Coast, North Queensland and Regional Victoria.
mack  |  
17 Jul 2012 07:13 PM
 
 
Ha ha ha ha ha ha- i'm laughing cos i'm also a football zombie! Gimme more! Om nom nom!
paolo  |  
17 Jul 2012 06:16 PM
 
 
Add a cup compitition (during the season - not preseason), extend to 36 games and drop the finals series. Its what everyone wants but FFA can only see the dollar signs from the finals.
chloesdad  |  
17 Jul 2012 06:13 PM
 
 
I agree with the FFA cup comp maybe as a pre-season competition - Maybe run between August - October when the season main starts. It would act a pre-season warm up games for the A-league clubs and will tie into the end of the state league comps when teams will be at their best. Also a good way to put state league players in the shop window before the season starts. A Cup Final the week before the season starts would be a great lead in.
Phil - Umina  |  
17 Jul 2012 04:23 PM
 
Poll
Which opening round fixture are you most looking forward to?




David Hall

Editor of footballaustralia.com.au, former editor of Australian Football Weekly and The Full90, and a former Fox Sports and Alpha magazine journalist, David Hall is a football tragic.