Holger Osieck has named his squad for the forthcoming friendly against Lebanon. Some of the names announced have been met with predictable groans.

Are the detractors justified, or is this just the inevitable sniping that occurs whenever a squad is announced?

In past times, it’s been easy to cut Osieck slack with his selections. Various responses have been offered in his defence, ranging from, “He hasn’t been in the job very long and needs to get an understanding of the players available”, to “There is not enough talent coming through to replace the old guard”.

Those justifications will not wash anymore.

Certainly one problem is the terms on which national team coaches seem to be appointed. Specifically, it feels that the focus to a very large extent is World Cup qualification.

No one disputes the importance of World Cup qualification, but a sole focus on this can cause long-term problems, which arguably we are suffering from now. We can’t just rely on the national youth teams to develop in a vacuum, they need a shove.

Mark Schwarzer (39), Lucas Neill (34), Sasa Ognenovski (33), Mark Bresciano (32) despite his Indian (Arabian?) summer, and Archie Thompson (33) all look pretty old and rusty now, and I think it’s beyond even WD40 to fix them. Add two years to them to take us to Rio and it looks pretty ugly.

Let’s be honest, on current trend, if both Vince Grella (32) and Harry Kewell (33) find clubs (it doesn’t seem to matter where, based on recent experiences with Neill and Bresciano), then it’s a safe assumption that we will see them in future squads too.

Dead rubbers versus Saudi Arabia, and friendlies against Scotland and Lebanon should not be used to help players set appearance records, provide free flights home to visit family and friends and rack up the frequent flyer points.

They should have seen the likes of Luongo, Kruse, Rukavystya, Langerak, Babalj, etc given starts and a taste of real action.

Traditionalists may say that players need to "earn" caps and the right to represent the national team.

To a certain extent, the purist in me wants to agree, but the realist in me says that if we maintain that thought pattern through to the World Cup in 2014 (should we qualify), then our involvement in that tournament could be rather abrupt.

Not to mention the problems we will face for the Asian Cup in 2015 on home soil when almost an entire squad will have retired en-masse and we will be playing an untested new squad who will not be match-hardened at international level, despite being in their mid-20s, due to lack of prior opportunity.

Of course, there is always the possibility that 2015 may see the old guard given a last hurrah, which will see Australia compete as an Over 35s “Masters” team, which would be funny if it wasn’t actually so plausible.

Rather than hand out token call-ups to glorified train-on members the coaches need to be bolder in their selections.

More kudos needs to go to the exploits of our Asian-based foreign contingent. After all, that’s where Sasa Ognenovski made his name.

The likes of Eddy Bosnar (yes, I know he said a bad thing 10 years ago, but a build a bridge!) and Robbie Cornthwaite (guess what, he’s not a gangly 22-year-old anymore!) are performing now with the same aplomb shown by Sasa at his peak in Korea in a league rated higher than ours, yet they are consistently overlooked by selectors.

We seem to pick people based on their reputation rather than actual output. McKay, North and Milligan, for example, have not exactly set their respective leagues on fire in recent times through a combination of poor form, injury and non-selection.

Square pegs in round holes is another trap that Osieck seems to have fallen into. Spiranovic as a left back? Milligan as a holding midfielder? McKay at left back?

Let’s try and be better than just falling for lazy stereotypes about the A-League boys not being good enough.

I’d respectfully suggest that if Newcastle United thinks that Curtis Good is good enough for a $500,000 transfer fee and six-year contract then Osieck could do worse than consider him for the national team.

Same goes for Eli Babalj (Red Star Belgrade). Players like Aziz Behich, Michael Marrone and Terry Antonis are good enough to have attracted interest from top European teams like Besiktas, Cagliari and Moenchengladbach respectively in recent times – call me crazy, but maybe that suggests they are of national team quality?

It’s amazing how a cap gets handed out when Aussie players sign for UK League One or German second division teams, as if somehow this magically transforms them overnight into a better player than the week before when they were mere humble A-League players.

If the recent 3-1 loss against the might of Scotland, a team ranked 46th in the world, isn’t a wake-up than nothing is. Apart from another lacklustre performance against Lebanon, that is (127th in the world, for those taking note).

The views in this article are solely those of the author and do represent those of Football Federation Australia or the Qantas Socceroos team.

 
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect those of Football Federation Australia.
Comments (14)
 
The Golden period for australian soccer players ended more than 8 years ago. Our current australian soccer bearucracy is to busy dictating a coaching curricculum to the rest of us who have spent years playing the game. A beaurocracy that is preaching that the modern soccer philosophy, is the 433 formation. Formation is Formation and soccer phlosophy is soccer philosohpy the two are not the same.All over the country this soccer beaurocracy are punishing anyone who is trying to still teach soccer philosophy, or any player that is not playing according to their philosophy. This new brand of formation soocer philosophy is actually dumbing down our players. Our curent crop of players are athletes/soccer players as opposed to the past when we were creating soccer players/athletes.. In the past our players could adapt to play anything as opposed to now our current players only being groomed to play one way. In the past our teams adapted to beat our competition nowadays we can only beat oppostion that lets us beat them, and struggle to adapt to opposition that makes it hards for us to beat them. This is only the start of our demise. Wake up before it is too late. The FFA and its state beauracracies should stop dictating before it is too late. The spanish FA would NOT EVEN DREAM OF TRYNG to tell Barcelona how to run it's soccer development. The spanish national team coach would not even attempt to tell the barcelona team coach how to coach. I think it is about time THE FFA , its memeber states and national team coaches did the same too. Otherwise the natual evolution of our soocer in this country will stagnate and go backwards. People are laready voting with their feet, they do not want to see the same crap over and over again at A- league. Stop trying to make us all PLAY the same way it is stifling our evolution of Australian soccer.
frank m  |  
12 Sep 2012 11:38 PM
 
 
The ageing Socceroos who did us proud against Uraguay and in the 2006 WC are in need of a transformation and a game revitalisation. While the issues are debateable, the underlying truth is that the quality, talent and skill of the new brigade has not measured up over the last 5 to 8 years hence very few players are first team regulars in the premier competitions in Europe. Our recent poor performances at U 20, U23 and 2012 Olympic qualifying games is testamentary as to why most of the young bridage haven't been called up for the Socceroos. We have seen some patches of emerging potential and some of their names are mentioned below, however, few if any are first team regulars and still need to show consistency. Osieck over the next 6 months ahead of the final WC qualifying games in June 2013 needs to be bold and challenge the new player brigade to produce at International level with 3 or 4 friendly against Asian countries in the other qualifying group. . . . call it a B side if you must but give them exposure to the team, game plans & pressure that comes with wearing the Socceroo shirt. Continuing to tread water with little forward progress will sink the Socceroos for Rio 2014 and will do nothing for the Asian Championships in 2015.
JOHN  |  
8 Sep 2012 11:16 PM
 
 
Instead of asking why Holgar refuses to pick younger players, I think people need to ask why club mangers aren't picking our players. In top leagues, the most common starters so far this season have been goalkeepers, and sadly only 1 can be picked per game. When the rest of our players aren't good enough to get a game in any of the top leagues, it shows how far our players have fallen behind the rest of the world in technical development and this is the key issue.
Aussie Lad in London  |  
4 Sep 2012 09:37 AM
 
 
I understand there are reasons for keeping the old guard - 1 his job is to Qualify for the world cup, and he probably doesn't feel safe gambling on youth. 2 he likes the character of the old guys and is slowly trying to introduce youth who will adopt the right mentality for succeeding in international football. Perhaps Job description should be changed to: Win a world cup within 10 years; get 8 socceroos under 25 into first team football at top clubs - Barcelona, Manchester United, Milan, Real Madrid, City, Arsenal, Juve etc; Win asian cup with players mostly under 24 in order to prepare for world cup and utilise the 'shop window'. This is a golden Generation. If any of them were around in the days that kewell started they too would have got their break and found success at big clubs by now. Time is ticking and once they reach mid 20's it may be too late to secure the education required to win a world cup. So much talent now. They talk of the golden generation, well the golden generation is blocking the way for a diamond generation. Keep Cahill, Kewell, Holman, Neill, Valerie, and maybe one or two others and pick the rest from the bag of diamonds under 23 right now. Win a world cup.
Dave  |  
2 Sep 2012 02:49 PM
 
 
Hey guys i totally agree with your points......I hope selection is NOT because of what they did in the "period" before.....I definitely preach that players should be there on MERIT...but the main problem with this is that some players have quality around them so they shine as well but in a team of lesser quality players, they SHOULD rise to the occasion and be the "standouts" but many can not step up. So what is the problem?? how they are coached?? what role they been told to play in?? Teams become successful specially at International level with players who are not now the "best" player there but by binding together as a unit not continuing to be individuals. Of course individual talent can win games but majority of matches are won by a TEAM. Till our players can gain the right mentality to play at the highest...we must not forget this is only 6 years after our 32year drought from World Cup participation, then we will see Aussie players gel together as a UNIT and entertain......
Ed  |  
31 Aug 2012 04:51 PM
 
 
Answering the concerns of people like Ed is easy, what are the current incumbents doing that is justifing their selection? I bet your main answer is that they have done the job for us in the past. Well it is always nice to look in the rear view mirror of life and wallow in your glory days - but how about we now start looking through the windscreen and plan our route forward instead?
Jeremy  |  
31 Aug 2012 02:27 PM
 
 
Ed, I think The Offsider more than adequately rebutts your ocncerns here: "Traditionalists may say that players need to "earn" caps and the right to represent the national team. To a certain extent, the purist in me wants to agree, but the realist in me says that if we maintain that thought pattern through to the World Cup in 2014 (should we qualify), then our involvement in that tournament could be rather abrupt. Not to mention the problems we will face for the Asian Cup in 2015 on home soil when almost an entire squad will have retired en-masse and we will be playing an untested new squad who will not be match-hardened at international level, despite being in their mid-20s, due to lack of prior opportunity."
Umberto  |  
31 Aug 2012 10:39 AM
 
 
The selection of players as we all know rely on firstly being released by their clubs, secondly are fit to play not carrying niggles and thirdly are the best choice for the position on the park. If we start looking at ages or in-experience at international level we are ignoring the simple fact....players are selected on merit. If they perform week in week out at club level at the top competitions in the world.......not many are close to Europe leagues of BPL, La Liga, Bundesliga and Serie A any others are not at that level. The bottom line we should be putting out on the park the best team we can manage to.....
Ed  |  
31 Aug 2012 08:27 AM
 
 
I actually find it difficult to argue with most of the points raised, mainly because they are what most people are thinking. Holger's honeymoon is long over....and just like Pim he will now trot out the lines " not good enough" to justify non selection ( although in Herd case....the boy is taking the pi55) . much as I want to see no wrong in a German coach :-D , he needs to be told " man muss manchmal in den sauren apfel beißen"
andre  |  
31 Aug 2012 07:58 AM
 
 
@felix herd has been picked for a few squads now he just keeps getting injured. would it hurt to try porta as well? considering alot of people complain about the strikers anyway.
Xavier  |  
30 Aug 2012 08:52 PM
 
 
This is so true. I often talk with people about whether or not our players are going in the right direction. Sure, playing in Asia is higher quality than playing in Australia but how good are they on a world scale? The national team really needs to make some big decisions. I think its sad that I see players in England such as Herd, who I had never known are Australian simply because they haven't been given a chance in the national team.
Jasch  |  
30 Aug 2012 05:47 PM
 
 
I have serious doubts that we will even make this WC with some of the recent performances. And even if we do, I can't see us doing much good at all. Considering at the last WCQ, we smoked the field and only conceded one goal in the process, then come WC time, we got schooled. That doesn't say much for our hopes at Rio.
Concerned Fan  |  
30 Aug 2012 05:16 PM
 
 
There is just no excuse for constant overlooking of certain individuals due to petty historical personality clashes. How can herd not get picked playing for villa but Archie in a-league off-season just needs to put his hand up and he's automatic?
Felix  |  
30 Aug 2012 03:56 PM
 
 
WOW....a few home truths there. Difficult to disagree much with that, though I suppose Davidson and McGowan are a nod to the future, though the term 'tokenistic' can probably be aimed at them too. Whatever personal opinions may be on the current starting eleven, surely the fact is that if these guys (Neill, Bresciano, Sasa, etc) are still being picked in 2014 then we have a serious problem, and it's fair enough to ask the question, what are we doing to mitigate that? Friendlies and dead rubbers should be used as valuable matches in which to blood the newbies, not to allow guys that have played together for the last 10 years to 'gel' even more. If after 10 years of 'gelling', we are getting beat 3-1 by Scotland, I don't think there is much to lose by trying a few fresh faces while we still have time.
Paul Oliver  |  
30 Aug 2012 01:44 PM
 
Poll
Which opening round fixture are you most looking forward to?