Hyundai A-League should cross the line

The English Premier League looks to be on the verge of introducing goal-line technology – but Australia should steal a march on the Poms (not for the first time) and introduce it first.

Plans to bring the technology into the biggest league in the world were initially set for season 2013/14, but now it seems it could be introduced sometime in the middle of next season – depending on FIFA approval, obviously.

But imagine the interest we could stir up if the A-League did it first.

After decades of debate, FIFA will decide at a special meeting in July if the world game will finally be able to introduce goal-line technology, and EPL chief executive Peter Scudamore said, “The fact we have got a better way of detecting it means there is some possibility of introducing it mid-season if we get it right.”

That’s a big Christmas present for Premier League fans but if FFA were able to bring the technology to Australia first, the A-League would become the focus of attention of the football world, highlighting it as a progressive and positive domestic competition.

FIFA trials have narrowed the choices down to two systems: British company Hawk-Eye places seven high-speed cameras at each goal and, as in tennis and cricket, triangulates the exact position of the ball; the Danish-German system, GoalRef, places an aerial with a magnetic signal inside the ball, which is picked up by sensors in the posts and sends a signal to the match officials.

Both systems are being tested by independent examiners for FIFA, and both could be approved if the meet FIFA’s criteria, the decision will then go before the International Football Association Board (IFAB) on 2 July.

Individual leagues would then have the option to choose which technology to adopt, with the American MLS reported to be eager to bring it in for the 2013 season, which kick off next March.

So what if FFA got in first and brought the technology the Australia in October?

Given the work the head honchos are doing the new club for western Sydney it seems unlikely they’d want to take on something else ahead of season 2012/13 but there’s no doubt it would provide a massive boost of interest and publicity for the game in this country.

There are a number of factors that could influence the decision - Hawk-Eye, for example, will reportedly cost about $400,000 to install at each stadium but viewers are already used to the technology and it would be great TV.

GoalRef, on the other hand, would be less dramatic but almost instantaneous, and much cheaper to install, with a mass production version apparently already in the pipeline.

UEFA boss Michel Platini recently re-stated his opposition to the introduction to goal-line technology, saying he wants the game to remain human, but there is little place for romanticism in modern-day big business football.

Given Australian sports fans’ familiarity with video referees and in-game technology, introducing it to the A-League would also no doubt go some way to winning over some of the sceptics.

But most of all it would be a good – no – a great news story for the A-League, the first national league in the world to adopt the new technology, as millions watch with interest to see how it affects the game in a real-life situation.

It won’t be used for offsides or fouls or any other aspect of the game, only to determine those impossible decisions that so often decide big game.

Australian sport is already a world-leading innovator – let’s send a signal to the rest of the football world that our league ready to cross that line.

The view expressed in this article are purely the author's and do not reflect those of Football federation Australia.

 
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect those of Football Federation Australia.
Comments (15)
 
I don't see why everyone is so against it. Anything that makes the game fairer, and the ref's job easier, is a good thing, Let;s leave it at that. Why is everyone insisting that we leave damaging inaccuracies in our game, just to keep the "tradition", or keep the "beautiful game"?
Caleb  |  
6 Jul 2012 01:49 PM
 
 
Theres plenty of things we could lead the footballing world in. This for one, the hidden cameras in the crowd and cameras in the changing rooms at halftime for every game, mic'ing up the refs as well as the managers ...
AJ  |  
13 Jun 2012 09:01 AM
 
 
The public have super human expectations of referees and crucify them any time they get something wrong (And when they get something right as well - as in the A-League grand final with the decision vindicated by every major analyst). If you aren't going to give them to do their jobs to the best of their abilities then you don't deserve to be able to criticise their mistakes.
Matt  |  
4 Jun 2012 11:30 AM
 
 
In many ways i think it is a very good idea,but my concern is the stop starting that could be caused while waiting for a decision. I think it should be diffidently used in cup finals semi finals and quarter finals. These games are the climax of the year and would greatly benefit against any incorrect decisions.
Graham Deakin  |  
4 Jun 2012 11:03 AM
 
 
Leave the beautiful game intact. Goal Line Technology represenets the thin edge of the wedge. We need look no further than our local NRL to see the downside. Referees defer the most mundane decisions to the video ref as it is simply another revenue stream for the sponsor. And they still make mistakes on the key decsions! The most recent State of Origin was a farce.
Das Boot  |  
3 Jun 2012 08:17 PM
 
 
Is that really all you care about ,beating us to introduce goal line technology.maybe you should first look at your own dodgy officials standards as happened at the Grand Final. The standard of officials in the A league you could put 10 referees and goal line technology and still get it wrong. Please can you let us know the times you have stolen a march on us (not for the first time ) as i am struggling to think what it could be,maybe the first time skippy caused the match to be abandoned?
AW  |  
2 Jun 2012 07:16 PM
 
 
Sounds like a good idea if it isn't too expensive. But I don't to turn football into the stop/go that we have in other sports. I would prefer the fact that we admit that there can be mistakes made to having video referees and still having mistakes as in teh NRL.
Alan  |  
28 May 2012 04:46 PM
 
 
Brilliant! Get the a-leauge in the news world wide!
Shanen  |  
27 May 2012 02:53 AM
 
 
I'm for it provided the costs aren't prohibitive and the technology is instantaneous (which I suspect it is). Just saying the game is already hugely popular so why mess with it doesn't make much sense to me. I think Tennis and Cricket have both been improved from a fairness and entertainment perspective thanks to them not being old fuddy duddies like FIFA.
Scott  |  
25 May 2012 06:53 PM
 
 
The overuse of technology in sport is a thing we don't need,look at NRL the refs go to the video ref at the drop of a hat,which in turn stops the game just look at Wednesday's State of Origin,the time it took to award that last try was terrible.Leave the game as it is,the amount of times they would need to use it would be negligible.I'm with Platini.
Tony Keepence  |  
25 May 2012 02:00 PM
 
 
cant understand why do not to use just common sense and existing video technology and use it in all controversial moments. Line Technology must be expensive and we do not have the money - or we have it??
Lubanski  |  
24 May 2012 10:09 AM
 
 
Why do we need this, the game has existed for over 150 years and prospered on the back of contentious issues and discussion points, please do not completely sanitise this great game
Tom  |  
23 May 2012 01:09 PM
 
 
Oh yeah? So we've got that amount of cash just lazily sitting in a bank account somewhere have we? For something that happens...how many times a season did you mention? Forget it. I'm with Platini.
jonny  |  
22 May 2012 10:19 PM
 
 
The fact this article doesn't reflect is that FIFA's requirements are that any goal-line tech system must be instantaneous, reporting goals straight to the referee. Potentially Fox could tap into a HawkEye system to bring up some pretty graphics for home viewers, but there won't be the sit-and-wait-for-the-big-screen-decision drama of rugby/tennis/cricket - the whole point of FIFA's rules is that any technology must not affect the flow of the game in any way.
Scott  |  
22 May 2012 08:25 PM
 
 
Trying to make a decision on whether either technology is a sound investment, and which to opt for, between now and October seems a pretty tall order to me, so I think this is just a bit of kite-flying. Something the article doesn't mention, but which may be of interest, is that Hawk-eye was put through its paces at St Mary's Stadium in Southampton in the Hampshire Cup final between Eastleigh and Basingstoke, a world first in a competitive football match. Amazingly, there was a question as to whether one of the goals in that match actually crossed the goalline! However, the referee did not have access to Hawk-eye and made his own decision in the time-honoured way. We haven't been told what Hawk-eye made of it.
Donald Murray  |  
22 May 2012 06:02 PM
 
Poll
Who was you man of the match against Iraq?